|
Chapter 6
|
Trends in Land Prices
|
|
|
Note:
In Japan,
land is regarded as a separate asset from buildings. Therefore,
the term gLand Priceh is normally used instead of gProperty
Priceh, not only for an agricultural land but also for developed
lands. Land prices are normally
determined by market comparisons utilizing land price indices
prepared by the Government; such as those within the gLand Price
Publicationh by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
|
|
Land-price
Trends in 2003 - based on 2004fs Published Land Prices
Based
on land-prices published in 2004, general land-price trends in
2003 were as follows:
1) Year-on-year
land prices continued to decline beyond January 2003, but in
relation to lands for commercial use the actual extent of the
decline has diminished for two consecutive years; and, in the case
of lands for residential use, for the first time in 6 years.
2) In
the three large metropolitan areas, the extent of land-price
decline has diminished both for lands for residential and
commercial use. In local areas, on the other hand, the extent of
land-price decline increased for lands for residential use, but
remained the same as the previous year for lands for commercial
use.
3)
By
way of background to the diminishing rate of land-price decline in
the three large metropolitan areas, we can point to recent signs
of economic recovery in Japan, the continuing
trend of population-return to the city centers and an enhanced
capacity to attract consumers through urban renaissance measures.
4
In
the gCentral Wards Areah of Tokyo, there was an
increase in the number of sites where land prices either rose or
leveled off. In some parts of the gSouth-West Wards Areah and
gNorth-East Wards Areah of Tokyo, and in the
gTama Areah, there was an expansion in the foot-print of sites
where land prices had either leveled-off or almost leveled-off. In
gNearby Tokyo Areah in Chiba Prefecture there were a
number of sites where land prices actually increased. In all of
these areas, it appears the bottoming-out trend has strengthened.
5)
In Nagoya City, Sapporo City and Fukuoka City as well, there
were an increasing number of sites where land prices had either
increased or leveled off. With regard to the Osaka area, there was
only a slight increase in the number of sites where land prices
had leveled-off, and this only related to lands for commercial use
in the Cities of Osaka and Kyoto.
6)
The bottoming-out trend in the
gTokyo Wards Areah, observed in published land prices of one
year ago, has now also emerged in the main cities of other
regional areas. And this is seen and interpreted as a sign of
change in land-price trends across Japan.
|
Land-price trends in the
various regions were as follows:
|
|
Chart 6-1-1
|
Rates of Change in the
Prefectures
|
|
(unit : %)
| @ |
Lands
for Residential Use |
Lands
for Commercial Use |
| 2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
| Japan |
’5.8 |
’5.7 |
’8.0 |
’7.4 |
Average
of three
Metropolitan Areas |
’6.5 |
’5.7 |
’7.1 |
’5.8 |
Tokyo
area
Osaka area
Nagoya area |
’5.6
’8.8
’5.6 |
’4.7
’8.0
’4.9 |
’5.8
’10.2
’8.0 |
’4.5
’8.8
’6.0 |
| Average in
Local Areas |
’5.1 |
’5.7 |
’8.7 |
’8.7 |
01.Hokkaido
02.Aomori
03.Iwate
04.Miyagi
05.Akita |
’4.6
’0.9
’1.5
’6.1
’1.4 |
’4.9
’2.5
’2.8
’6.8
’3.7 |
’7.0
’7.7
’5.6
’10.3
’5.6 |
’6.5
’8.9
’7.3
’10.7
’9.0 |
06.Yamagata
07.Fukushima
08.Ibaraki
09.Tochigi
10.Gumma |
’2.2
’5.0
’6.9
’6.5
’6.6 |
’3.8
’5.5
’7.5
’6.8
’6.0 |
’7.7
’11.0
’10.7
’11.3
’10.0 |
’8.2
’10.1
’11.0
’11.2
’9.4 |
11.Saitama
12.Chiba
13.Tokyo
14.Kanagawa
15.Niigata |
’5.7
’8.6
’4.1
’5.5
’5.8 |
’5.1
’7.0
’3.1
’5.0
’7.0 |
’6.7
’11.0
’3.9
’8.1
’8.5 |
’6.3
’8.9
’2.7
’6.6
’9.5 |
16.Toyama
17.Ishikawa
18.Fukui
19.Yamanashi
20.Nagano |
’5.8
’8.7
’7.2
’8.3
’5.9 |
’8.9
’8.7
’6.3
’9.5
’7.1 |
’10.6
’10.2
’10.5
’11.7
’11.6 |
’12.6
’10.7
’9.4
’11.7
’10.3 |
21.Gifu
22.Shizuoka
23.Aichi
24.Mie
25.Shiga |
’7.3
’6.1
’5.8
’3.5
’8.0 |
’7.5
’6.0
’4.8
’5.4
’6.5 |
’10.5
’9.3
’8.2
’8.4
’11.6 |
’10.5
’7.9
’6.1
’8.5
’8.9 |
26.Kyoto
27.Osaka
28.Hyogo
29.Nara
30.Wakayama |
’7.9
’8.5
’9.7
’8.1
’5.3 |
’8.2
’7.7
’8.5
’8.8
’6.2 |
’9.2
’10.1
’11.6
’10.3
’7.9 |
’7.2
’9.0
’10.2
’10.2
’9.1 |
31.Tottori
32.Shimane
33.Okayama
34.Hiroshima
35.Yamaguchi |
’3.8
’0.2
’7.9
’4.9
’4.7 |
’4.9
’0.9
’7.0
’6.2
’6.1 |
’7.9
’3.7
’10.3
’8.4
’9.6 |
’8.1
’5.5
’7.9
’9.0
’9.8 |
36.Tokushima
37.Kagawa
38.Ehime
39.Kochi
40.Fukuoka |
’3.9
’4.4
’3.9
’1.4
’4.2 |
’6.8
’5.2
’4.9
’1.5
’5.2 |
’8.2
’7.7
’8.6
’8.2
’7.2 |
’11.2
’8.7
’8.1
’7.7
’7.7 |
41.Saga
42.Nagasaki
43.Kumamoto
44.Oita
45.Miyazaki |
’1.5
’5.0
’4.2
’1.5
’0.6 |
’2.5
’5.6
’5.2
’2.7
’0.9 |
’5.9
’9.5
’6.7
’5.8
’3.6 |
’6.7
’9.1
’6.9
’6.5
’3.7 |
46.Kagoshima
47.Okinawa |
’1.0
’5.7 |
’1.5
’6.0 |
’4.2
’9.5 |
’4.7
’8.8 |
|
|
Note1 :
|
Prices are as of 1st of January each year.
|
|
|
Note2
:
|
’
mark indicates minus
|
|
|
Note3 :
|
Change ratios are the average of change ratios of land prices
on the previous year at points where continuously used for published
land prices in this year and in the previous year
|
|
|
Note4 :
|
The three metropolitan areas include the Tokyo area, Osaka area and Nagoya
area
|
|
|
|
Tokyo area:
Osaka area:
Nagoya area:
|
Cities, wards, towns and villages area including existing
Built-up Area and Suburban Development and Redevelopment Area based
on the gNational Capital Region Development Acth
Cities, towns and villages area including existing Built-up Areas and Suburban Development and Redevelopment
Areas based on the gKinki Region Development Acth
Cities, towns and villages area including existing Urban Improvement Area based on the gChubu Region Development Acth
|
|
|
Note5 :
|
local area is those which are not included in the three
metropolitan areas (the same definitions are used in Charts below)
|
|
|
Chart 6-1-2
|
Locations where land prices
increased, leveled off or almost leveled off
|
| @ |
increased
(0%<price-change
ratio) |
leveled
off
(price-change
ratio=0%) |
almost
leveled off
(’1.0%<price-change
ratio<0%) |
| 2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
| Tokyo
Wards Area |
residential |
6 |
10 |
21 |
71 |
98 |
120 |
95 |
118 |
259 |
| commercial |
14 |
39 |
50 |
20 |
49 |
65 |
8 |
23 |
96 |
Central
Wards |
residential |
4 |
4 |
17 |
60 |
79 |
86 |
36 |
26 |
39 |
| commercial |
14 |
38 |
48 |
19 |
41 |
44 |
7 |
15 |
28 |
South
West |
residential |
2 |
6 |
4 |
10 |
18 |
31 |
57 |
84 |
207 |
| commercial |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
18 |
1 |
7 |
47 |
North East
Wards |
residential |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
14 |
| commercial |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
| Tama
Area |
residential |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
8 |
18 |
| commercial |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
Chiba
Prefecture
Near Tokyo Area |
residential |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| commercial |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Osaka
City |
residential |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| commercial |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Kyoto
City |
residential |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| commercial |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Nagoya
City |
residential |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| commercial |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| Sapporo
City |
residential |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
| commercial |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
| Fukuoka
City |
residential |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
| commercial |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
1.@General Conditions in the Tokyo Area
|
|
(1) Lands
for residential use
The
extent of land-price decline has diminished in all areas.
In
fact, in the gTokyo Wards Areah, the extent of land-price
decline has diminished for five consecutive years. In the gCentral
Wards Areah, in particular, land-prices have already almost
leveled-off; and in the gSouth West Wards Areah are at the point
of almost leveling-off.
At
all sites designated for published land-pricing in Minato and
Shibuya Wards, land-prices have either increased or leveled-off. In
Minato Ward, overall land-prices have turned and are increasing
again. In Shibuya Ward they have been increasing for two consecutive
years. And, in Chiyoda Ward, prices have also turned, and are
increasing.
Land-prices
have almost leveled off in most other wards in Tokyofs gCentral Wards
Areah and gSouth-West Wards Areah, and also in Koto Ward in
the gNorth-East Wards Areah.
Urayasu City and Ichikawa City in the gNearby
Tokyo Areah of Chiba Prefecture have also produced
some sites where land-prices increased. And in cities like Musashino
and Mitaka in gTama Areah, there was an increase in the number
of sites where land prices had leveled-off or almost leveled-off.
As
background to the above situation, we can point to reasonable-price
perceptions amongst potential buyers, to an increase in the number
of inner-city conveniences arising out of redevelopment projects and
to the continuous movement of people returning to central city
locations, which has led to a steady demand for residential
property, including condominium apartments.
In
remote suburban areas, where commuting to work is not easy, we have
observed a continuous steep decline in land prices at sites where
traffic-movement and transportation convenience is inferior. On the
other hand, in areas where relatively better public conveniences
exist, there were some sites where the price decline was only
slight.
(2) Lands
for commercial use
The
extent land-price decline has diminished in all areas.
In
the gTokyo Wards Areah, the extent of land-price
decline has diminished for five consecutive years. In Shibuya Ward,
in particular, land-prices have been on the increase for two years;
and in Ota, Setagaya and Koto Wards land-prices have almost leveled
off.
In
the gCentral Wards Areah, we have seen an increase in the number
of sites where land-prices have risen or leveled off. In parts of
the gSouth-West Wards Areah and the gNorth-East Wards Areah,
and in Musashino City in the gTama
Areah, there has been an increase in the number of sites where
land prices have either leveled-off or almost leveled-off.
In
the gCentral Wards Areah in particular (in highly dense
commercial areas, in areas where overseas brand shops have recently
been established and in areas where traffic infrastructure
development projects and urban renaissance measures have been
promoted) we observe continuously many sites where land-prices have
either increased or leveled off. In such areas as Ginza
and Omote-Sando, for
example, we continue to observe sites where high rates of increase
in land prices are being achieved.
In
locations other than the gCentral Wards Areah, near
Futago-Tamagawa Station and Kashiwa Station, there are sites where
land prices have turned and are increasing.
|
|
|
|
Chart 6-1-3
|
Rates of Change in the Tokyo Area
|
|
(unit : %)
| @ |
Lands
for Residential Use |
Lands
for Commercial Use |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
| Tokyo prefecture |
’4.1 |
’3.1 |
’3.9 |
’2.7 |
| Tokyo Wards
Area |
’1.9 |
’1.3 |
’3.4 |
’2.2 |
|
Central Wards Area |
’1.1 |
’0.4 |
’3.6 |
’2.3 |
|
South West Wards Area |
’1.5 |
’1.0 |
’2.2 |
’1.3 |
|
North East Wards Area |
’3.1 |
’2.3 |
’4.2 |
’2.9 |
| Tama Area |
’6.3 |
’5.1 |
’6.2 |
’5.1 |
| Kanagawa Prefecture |
’5.5 |
’5.0 |
’8.1 |
’6.6 |
| Yokohama
City |
’5.2 |
’4.6 |
’8.1 |
’6.7 |
| Kawasaki
City |
’5.6 |
’4.7 |
’7.7 |
’6.2 |
| Other Areas |
’5.7 |
’5.4 |
’8.2 |
’6.7 |
| Saitama Prefecture |
’5.6 |
’4.9 |
’6.3 |
’5.6 |
| Near Tokyo
Area |
’4.1 |
’3.3 |
’4.8 |
’4.2 |
|
Saitama City |
’3.7 |
’3.4 |
’6.0 |
’5.8 |
| Other Areas |
’7.0 |
’6.6 |
’8.7 |
’8.0 |
| Chiba Prefecture |
’8.4 |
’6.6 |
’10.2 |
’8.0 |
| Near Tokyo
Area |
’6.7 |
’5.2 |
’8.5 |
’6.7 |
|
Chiba City |
’8.2 |
’6.7 |
’9.9 |
’7.9 |
| Other Areas |
’11.1 |
’9.0 |
’15.0 |
’11.5 |
| Ibaraki Prefecture |
’9.0 |
’8.5 |
’10.1 |
’9.4 |
| Tokyo Area |
’5.6 |
’4.7 |
’5.8 |
’4.5 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and
Transport
|
|
|
Note1 :
|
gCentral Wards Areah includes Chiyoda Ward, Chuo Ward, Minato
Ward, Shinjuku Ward, Bunkyo Ward, Taito Ward, Shibuya Ward and
Toshima Ward. gSouth West Wards Areah includes Shinagawa Ward,
Meguro Ward, Ota Ward, Setagaya Ward, Nakano Ward, Suginami
Ward and Nerima Ward. gNorth East Wards Areah includes Sumida
Ward, Koto Ward, Kita Ward, Arakawa Ward, Itabashi Ward, Adachi
Ward, Katsushika Ward and Edogawa Ward.
|
|
|
Note2
:
|
gNear Tokyo Area in Saitama Prefectureh
includes Saitama City, Tokorozawa City, Sayama City, Warabi City, Toda
City, Kawagoe City, Kawaguchi City, Hatogaya City, Asaka City, Shiki
City, Wako City, Niiza City, Fujimi City, Kamifukuoka City,
Oi Town and Miyoshi Town.
|
|
|
Note3 :
|
gNear Tokyo Area in Chiba
Prefecture h includes Ichikawa City, Urayasu City, Chiba City,
Funabashi City, Matsudo City, Narashino City,
Kashiwa City, Nagareyama
City and Yachiyo City.
|
|
|
Chart 6-1-4
|
Land-price Trends in the
Tokyo Area
|
(Lands for Residential Use)
| @Areas |
published
in
2002 |
published
in
2003 |
published
in
2004 |
annual
change ratio
in 2004 |
| Central
Wards Area |
|
|
|
’0.4 |
| South
West Wards Area |
|
|
|
’1.0 |
| North
East Wards Area |
|
|
|
’2.3 |
| Tama
Area |
|
|
|
’5.1 |
| Yokohama
City |
|
|
|
’4.6 |
| Kawasaki
City |
|
|
|
’4.7 |
| Other
Areas in Kanagawa Prefecture |
|
|
|
’5.4 |
| Near
Tokyo Area in Saitama Prefecture |
|
|
|
’3.3 |
| Other
Areas in Saitama Prefecture |
|
|
|
’6.6 |
| Near
Tokyo Area in Chiba Prefecture |
|
|
|
’5.2 |
| Other
Areas in Chiba Prefecture |
|
|
|
’9.0 |
| Ibaraki
Prefecture |
|
|
|
’8.5 |
(Lands for Commercial Use)
| Areas |
published
in
2001 |
published
in
2002 |
published
in
2003 |
annual
change ratio
in 2003 |
| Central
Wards Area |
|
|
|
’2.3 |
| South
West Wards Area |
|
|
|
’1.3 |
| North
East Wards Area |
|
|
|
’2.9 |
| Tama
Area |
|
|
|
’5.1 |
| Yokohama
City |
|
|
|
’6.7 |
| Kawasaki
City |
|
|
|
’6.2 |
| Other
Areas in Kanagawa Prefecture |
|
|
|
’6.7 |
| Near
Tokyo Area in Saitama Prefecture |
|
|
|
’4.2 |
| Other
Areas in Saitama Prefecture |
|
|
|
’8.0 |
| Near
Tokyo Area in Chiba Prefecture |
|
|
|
’6.7 |
| Other
Areas in Chiba Prefecture |
|
|
|
’11.5 |
| Ibaraki
Prefecture |
|
|
|
’9.4 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport
|
|
|
Note1 :
|
represents
extent of land price decline increased
represents extent of land price
decline diminished
represents same level of land
price decline
|
|
|
Note2
:
|
Prices are as of 1st January each year
|
|
|
|
|
2.@General Conditions in the Osaka Area
|
|
(1) Lands
for residential use
The
extent of land-price decline has diminished in almost all areas.
In
Tennoji Ward in Osaka City,
where demand for residential properties, including
condominium apartments, is steady, there are
sites where land-prices have continued to level-off, while in the
some of the surrounding areas the rate of land-price decline has
only been small.
(2) Lands
for commercial use
The
extent of land-price decline has diminished in all areas.
In
the gCentral Six Wardsh in Osaka City, in particular, the
extent of the decline in land prices has been diminishing for four
consecutive years.
In Osaka City, there has been an
increase in the number of sites where land-prices have leveled-off,
particularly around Osaka Station where urban renaissance measures
have been promoted. There has also been an increase in the number of
sites where land prices have leveled-off around Shinsaibashi, where
the location of new overseas-brand shops has been promoted.
In certain parts of Nakagyo and
Shimogyo Wards in Kyoto City, where retail fashion and
food-service outlets are promoted and customer throughput has been
improved, there are sites where previously
declining land-prices have turned and are currently leveling-off.
|
|
Chart 6-1-5
|
Rates of Change in the Osaka Area
|
|
(unit : %)
| @ |
Lands
for Residential Use |
Lands
for Commercial Use |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
| Osaka prefecture |
’8.5 |
’7.7 |
’10.1 |
’9.0 |
| Osaka City |
’6.1 |
’5.6 |
’8.7 |
’7.8 |
|
Central Six Wards |
’3.8 |
’3.9 |
’8.0 |
’6.9 |
| North Osaka |
’6.9 |
’6.8 |
’10.8 |
’9.5 |
| East Osaka |
’8.9 |
’7.9 |
’11.3 |
’10.5 |
| South Osaka |
’10.3 |
’9.0 |
’13.0 |
’11.3 |
| Hyogo Prefectures |
’9.9 |
’7.8 |
’11.0 |
’8.9 |
| Kobe City |
’9.9 |
’7.9 |
’10.1 |
’7.8 |
|
East Four Wards |
’6.0 |
’4.5 |
’9.7 |
’7.6 |
| Hanshin
Area |
’10.0 |
’7.8 |
’11.9 |
’9.9 |
| Kyoto Prefectures |
’8.4 |
’8.4 |
’9.8 |
’7.0 |
| Kyoto City |
’7.7 |
’7.3 |
’9.9 |
’6.7 |
|
Central Five Wards |
’6.2 |
’5.7 |
’8.2 |
’4.9 |
| Other
Areas |
’9.3 |
’10.0 |
’9.4 |
’8.5 |
| Nara Prefectures |
’8.1 |
’8.8 |
’10.3 |
’10.2 |
| Nara
City |
’8.4 |
’8.5 |
’10.8 |
’9.6 |
| Osaka Area |
’8.8 |
’8.0 |
’10.2 |
’8.8 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport
@
|
|
|
Note1 :
|
gCentral Six Wards in
Osaka Cityh
include Kita Ward, Fukushima Ward, Chuo Ward, Nishi ward, Tennoji
Ward, and Naniwa Ward.
|
|
|
Note2
:
|
gNorth
Osakah includes Toyonaka City, Suita City, Settsu City, Ikeda City,
Mino-o City, Ibaraki City, Takatsuki City, Shimamoto Town, Toyono Town,
Nose Town.
gEast Osakah
includes Hirakata City, Neyagawa City, Katano City, Moriguchi City, Kadoma
City, Shijonawate City, Daito City, Higashiosaka City, Yao City, Kashiwara
City.
gSouth Osakah includes areas in Osaka
Prefecture other than Osaka City,
gNorth Osakah and gEast
Osakah.
|
|
|
Note3 :
|
gEast Four Wards in Kobe Cityh
include Higashinada Ward, Nada Ward, Hyogo Ward and Chuo Ward.
|
|
|
Note4
:
|
gHanshin Areah includes Amagasaki City, Nishinomiya City, Ashiya
City, Itami City, Takarazuka City, Kawanishi City, Sanda City and Inagawa
Town.
|
|
|
Note5 :
|
gCentral Five Wards in Kyoto Cityh
include Kita Ward, Kamigyo Ward, Sakyo Ward, Nakagyo Ward and
Shimogyo Ward.
|
|
|
Chart 6-1-6
|
Land-price Trends in the Osaka Area
|
|
(Lands for Residential Use)
| @ |
published
in
2002 |
published
in
2003 |
published
in
2004 |
annual
change ratio
in 2004 |
| Osaka
City |
|
|
|
’5.6 |
| North
Osaka |
|
|
|
’6.8 |
| East
Osaka |
|
|
|
’7.9 |
| South
Osaka |
|
|
|
’9.0 |
| Kobe
City |
|
|
|
’7.9 |
| Hanshin
Area |
|
|
|
’7.8 |
| Kyoto
City |
|
|
|
’7.3 |
| Other
Areas in Kyoto Prefecture |
|
|
|
’10.0 |
| Nara
Prefecture |
|
|
|
’8.8 |
(Lands for Commercial Use)
| @ |
published
in
2002 |
published
in
2003 |
published
in
2004 |
annual
change ratio
in 2004 |
| Osaka
City |
|
|
|
’7.8 |
| North
Osaka |
|
|
|
’9.5 |
| East
Osaka |
|
|
|
’10.5 |
| South
Osaka |
|
|
|
’11.3 |
| Kobe
City |
|
|
|
’7.8 |
| Hanshin
Area |
|
|
|
’9.9 |
| Kyoto
City |
|
|
|
’6.7 |
| Other
Areas in Kyoto Prefecture |
|
|
|
’8.5 |
| Nara
Prefecture |
|
|
|
’10.2 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport
|
|
|
Note1 :
|
represents
extent of land price decline increased
represents extent of land price
decline diminished
represents same level of land
price decline
|
|
|
Note2
:
|
Prices are as of 1st January each year
|
|
|
|
|
3.@General Conditions in the Nagoya Area
|
|
(1) Lands
for residential use
The
extent of land-price decline has diminished in most areas.
In
the Eastern part of Nagoya City, and around the
newer train-stations in gAreas Near Nagoyah, we now see sites
where land-prices have turned and are leveling-off. In some parts of
the gNishi Mikawa Areah, including Toyota City, where the regional
economy is strong, there are sites where prices have continued to
level-off.
(2)
Lands for commercial use
In
most areas, the rate of land-price decline turned and diminished.
In Nagoya City, especially around Nagoya
Station (where urban-renaissance measures have been promoted and
commercial facilities are concentrating) there are some sites where
land-prices have turned and are now increasing. Also in the Sakae
area (where floor-space in large-scale commercial facilities has
increased, and new overseas-brand shops have been promoted), and in
the Oosu area (where the retailing of IT and secondhand brand-name
products is concentrated) there are sites where land-prices had
turned, and were increasing or leveling-off
|
|
Chart 6-1-7
|
Rates of Change in the Nagoya Area
|
|
(unit : %)
| @ |
Lands
for Residential Use |
Lands
for Commercial Use |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
| Aichi prefecture |
’5.9 |
’4.8 |
’8.0 |
’5.9 |
| Nagoya City |
’7.2 |
’5.5 |
’8.3 |
’5.7 |
| Area Near
Nagoya |
’7.5 |
’5.5 |
’11.2 |
’7.5 |
| Owari Area |
’5.2 |
’4.4 |
’8.7 |
’6.3 |
| Nishi
Mikawa Area |
’2.9 |
’2.9 |
’5.8 |
’4.9 |
| Chita Area |
’6.3 |
’6.0 |
’8.6 |
’8.1 |
| Mie Prefectures |
’2.6 |
’5.3 |
’6.9 |
’7.3 |
| Yokkaichi
City |
’2.7 |
’5.5 |
’7.7 |
’7.9 |
| Nagoya Area |
’5.6 |
’4.9 |
’8.0 |
’6.0 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport
|
|
|
Note :
|
The areas in Aichi are as follows:
gNear Nagoya Areah includes Nagakute
Town, Owariasahi City, Toyoake City,
Togo Town, Nisshin City, Seto City, Kasugai City, Nishibiwajima Town, Toyoyama Town, Shikatsu Town, Nishiharu Town, Haruhi
Town,
Kiyosu Town,
Shinkawa Town, Shippo Town, Jimokuji Town, Oharu Town and Kanie Town.
gOwari Areah includes Inuyama City, Komaki City, Fuso
Town, Oguchi Town, Ichinomiya City, Konan City, Iwakura City, Kisogawa
Town, Bisai City, Inazawa City, Sobue Town, Heiwa Town, Miwa Town, Saori
Town, Hachikai Village, Tatsuta Village, Tushima City, Saya Town, Yatomi
Town, Jushiyama Village and Tobishima Village.
gNishi Mikawa Areah includes Okazaki City, Hekinan City, Kariya
City, Toyota City, Anjo City, Nishio City, Chiryu City, Takahama
City, Isshiki Town, Kira Town, Hazu Town, Kota Town and Miyoshi Town.
gChita Areah includes Tokai City, Obu City, Chita City, Higashiura
Town, Agui Town, Tokoname City, Handa City, Taketoyo Town, Mihama Town and Minamichita Town.
|
|
|
Chart 6-1-8
|
Land-price Trends in the Nagoya Area
|
(Lands for Residential Use)
| @Areas |
published
in
2002 |
published
in
2003 |
published
in
2004 |
annual
change ratio
in 2004 |
| Nagoya
City |
|
|
|
’5.5 |
| Areas
Near Nagoya |
|
|
|
’5.5 |
| Owari
Area |
|
|
|
’4.4 |
| Nishi
Mikawa Area |
|
|
|
’2.9 |
| Chita
Area |
|
|
|
’6.0 |
| Mie
Prefecture |
|
|
|
’5.3 |
(Lands for Commercial Use)
| @Areas |
published
in
2002 |
published
in
2003 |
published
in
2004 |
annual
change ratio
in 2004 |
| Nagoya
City |
|
|
|
’5.7 |
| Areas
Near Nagoya |
|
|
|
’7.5 |
| Owari
Area |
|
|
|
’6.3 |
| Nishi
Mikawa Area |
|
|
|
’4.9 |
| Chita
Area |
|
|
|
’8.1 |
| Mie Prefecture |
|
|
|
’7.3 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport
|
|
|
Note1 :
|
represents
extent of land price decline increased
represents extent of land price
decline diminished
represents same level of land
price decline
|
|
|
Note2
:
|
Prices are as of 1st January each year
|
|
|
|
|
4.@General Conditions in Local Areas
|
|
(l)
Lands for residential use
The
rate of land-price decline continued to grow in relation to lands
for residential use, but the extent of the decline was less than
that for lands for commercial use. In certain areas of Sapporo City and
Fukuoka City , especially where
urban conveniences are located, and along railway lines where the
residential environment is excellent (with good access to the city
center) we observed sites in the residential areas concerned where
land-prices had either increased or leveled-off.
(2)
Lands for commercial use
In
local areas overall, land-prices for commercial use declined to the
same extent as the previous year. In local cities with the
population of not
less than
100,000, however, the extent of this decline diminished.
Particularly in the central commercial areas of Sapporo City and Fukuoka
City, both being major
regional center
cities, there
had been an increase in the number of sites where land-prices either
increased or leveled-off. This was largely due to urban renaissance
efforts and traffic infrastructure development in these areas.
In the central commercial
districts of many local cities, on the other hand, where there has
been a slowing-down of the local economy together with the advance
of mass merchandising stores in suburban areas,
we observed many sites where land-prices had largely declined. This
has been due to the negative effects of office shutdowns and the
closure of small and medium retailers in shopping arcades who used
to play a major role in pulling in consumers.
|
|
Chart 6-1-9
|
Rates of Change in Local Cities
|
|
(unit : %)
| @ |
Lands
for Residential Use |
Lands
for Commercial Use |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
2003
1st January 2002
`
1st January 2003 |
2004
1st January 2003
`
1st January 2004 |
| Central cities in local
regions |
@ |
@ |
@ |
@ |
Hokkaido
Prefecture
Sapporo City |
’6.5 |
’6.3 |
’6.8 |
’5.7 |
Miyagi
Prefecture
Sendai City |
’7.2 |
’7.4 |
’11.7 |
’11.1 |
Hiroshima
Prefecture
Hiroshima City |
’6.8 |
’8.0 |
’10.6 |
’10.8 |
Fukuoka
Prefecture
Fukuoka City |
’6.1 |
’6.7 |
’7.1 |
’6.4 |
Cities surrounding the three
metropolitan areas |
@ |
@ |
@ |
@ |
Tochigi Prefectures
Utsunomiya City |
’7.0 |
’7.6 |
’15.2 |
’14.7 |
Yamanashi
Prefectures
Kofu City |
’11.2 |
’12.0 |
’17.4 |
’16.5 |
Mie
Prefectures
Tsu City |
’5.2 |
’6.0 |
’11.1 |
’9.7 |
Shiga
Prefectures
Otsu City |
’10.6 |
’8.4 |
’15.1 |
’11.1 |
| Other local cities |
@ |
@ |
@ |
@ |
Aomori
Prefecture
Aomori City |
’0.7 |
’2.3 |
’7.8 |
’9.4 |
Ibaraki
Prefecture
Mito City |
’7.5 |
’8.6 |
’15.7 |
’16.8 |
Niigata
Prefecture
Niigata City |
’9.2 |
’10.0 |
’10.4 |
’10.6 |
Shimane
Prefecture
Matsue City |
’0.4 |
’1.7 |
’7.9 |
’10.9 |
Oita
Prefecture
Oita City |
’1.5 |
’2.9 |
’8.1 |
’9.2 |
|
|
Source:
|
gPublished Land Pricesh by Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport
|
|
|
Chart 6-1-10
|
Average Rates of Change and
Rate of Change Trends for the Highest Priced Commercial Land in Local Cities with Population not less than 100,000
|
|
(unit : %)
| @ |
Published
in 2003 |
Published
in 2004 |
| Lands
for Residential Use |
’5.7 |
’6.3 |
| Lands
for Commercial Use |
’10.4 |
’10.1 |
Average Rate of Change
for the Highest Priced Lands (note) |
’14.2 |
’12.6 |
|
|
Note:
|
Covers 107 local cities with populations
not less than 100,000 - excluding one city (Niihama City) where rates of change cannot be
calculated because the published-land-price site that is normally
used for the highest land-price was re-designated
|
|
| Back to Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Home Page | Back to Land and Real Property in Japan |
| Contents |
All Rights Reserved, Copyright (C) 2004, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
|